Tell me a short summary of your story

Show me pictures of the story

Show me pictures of similar structures

Tell me the full story

Why did you tell me this story now?

What conclusions can I draw from your story?

Where can I find more information about this story?


Why did you tell me this story now?


Listen to the Audio Version


This is not a recent case of collapse; however it is relevant because it involved a very large structure for which state of the art techniques were used and yet collapse could not be prevented. This story illustrates several aspects of collapse investigation:


First, a large construction, which was apparently designed according to state of the art recommendations, failed a few months after completion. No significant material degradation occurred in this case, but wind loads were underestimated by the designers.


Second, this case was reported using hypothesis proof methodology. It illustrates the kind of hypothesis considered by the Committee of Inquiry, and summarized how they were discarded or considered based on the available evidence.